Revolut vs WorldRemit

Live fee, exchange rate and recipient amount comparison for USDINR. Pros, cons and licensing in one view.

Live data temporarily unavailable for this comparison. See the corridor page for full live numbers.

Neobank with multi-currency accounts, mid-market FX up to monthly limits, and a global Visa/Mastercard.

Live data unavailable.

Founded 2015
London, UK

Pros

  • Hold balances in 30+ currencies in a single account
  • Mid-market FX up to monthly free limit — best for occasional travel and small transfers
  • Strong mobile app with budgeting, savings, and crypto features

Cons

  • Free FX limits cap usefulness — heavy users hit the cap quickly
  • Weekend FX surcharge (0.5–1%) is annoying for active users
  • Customer support has historically been chat-only and slow
Try Revolut

UK-based digital remittance with strong African and Asian corridor coverage.

Live data unavailable.

Founded 2010
London, UK

Pros

  • Strong corridor coverage across Africa, Asia and LatAm
  • Multiple payout options (bank, cash, mobile wallet, airtime)
  • Mobile-first product, fast onboarding

Cons

  • Headline rate often lags Wise on major corridors
  • Limits on transfer amount per transaction
  • Some corridors restricted to bank deposit only
Try WorldRemit

Side-by-side comparison

SpecRevolutWorldRemit
Fee modelFree tier + premium subscriptionsFlat fee + rate markup
HeadquartersLondon, UKLondon, UK
Founded20152010
StatusPrivate (~$45B valuation, Bank of Lithuania licensed)Private (parent: Zepz)
Live USD→INR fee
Live USD→INR rate
Recipient gets (USD 1,000)
Typical speed
Top corridorsGBP→EUR, USD→EUR, GBP→USDGBP→NGN, GBP→PKR, GBP→INR

User reviews

We don't host our own reviews — we link to Trustpilot so the rating isn't influenced by us.

Frequently asked questions

Other comparisons

Live quotes from Wise's public comparison API, updated every 5 minutes. Provider profiles are based on public information; for pricing, KYC requirements and current promotions always check the provider's official site. Methodology.